Aiakartiiberiasforword

Aiakartiiberia//Georgia

Soviet imperialism was Russian//Muscovite imperialism imposed on 1/6th part of the earth. Head of the government of the Republic of Sakartvelo//Georgia, head of the Academy of Sciences of Sakartvelo//Georgia and other high officials were either simply sent from Moscow to take up high positions and be slaves of the Moscovite russianspeaking dictators, or chosen and approved by the ruler of the USSR among communists living in Tbilisi and hence obedient servants. Vasil Mzhavanadze lived in Moscow for decades, married there the sister of the wife of Nikita Khrushchev, and was a citizen of the Russian Federal Republic. By Nikita Khrushchev’s putch in March1953 resulting  in the assassination of Ioseb Jugashvili-Stalin, Lavrenti Beria and their followers, the ideological basis on which the USSR stood and the ideological glue of the USSR was destroyed.  N.Khrushchev soon after he usurped the position of the head of the USSR, summonned by phone call head of the Republic of Sakartvelo Aliosha//Alexandre Mirtskhulava from Tbilisi to the resort Sochi where he was on leave in summer in 1955. According to an article printed by A. Mirtskhulava himself  in Tbilisi in the Kartuli//Georgian language,  at an informal meeting in the hotel Khrushchov told him to write an official  application to the government of the USSR saying  that the Kartveli//Georgian nation//’Gruzinskii  narod ‘ expresses and displays her good will and is ready to give two northern regions then being part of the Republic of Sakartvelo//Georgia to the Russian Federal Republic. Those regions  including the highest mountain in western Eurasia, Gigish known also as Ialbuzi and Elbrus were returned to Sakartvelo as indigenous historical area of Sakartvelo in 1943 after an appropriate discussion of that problem by historians and politicians at the special session in Moscow where members of the government of the USSR were present.  The appropriate decision and a declaration were made to hand over, return those two northern areas back to Sakartvelo. On the day of the informal talk of N.Khrushchev with A. Mirtskhulava in 1955 in a governmental resort in Sochi, A. Mirtskhulava told N. Khrushchev that he would never write such an unjust letter as Russia kept even more Kartvelian//Georgian areas since 1801 when the Russian emperor  usurped the throne of the king of the Eastern Sakartvelo and exiled over 200 dignitaries( the Queen-mother, the queen, princes//tsareviches, their wives, daughters, sons, relatives, servaints to various areas in Russia and in Siberia. N. Khrushchev managed to dismiss, replace A. Mirtskhulava  and sent V. Mzhavanadze-a husband of the sister of N. Khrushchev’s wife and thus his close acquaintance-to become head of the Republic of Sakartvelo. In textbooks and on maps printed in 1943-1955 Elbrus//Ialbuzi area is in the Republic of Georgia and that is what I was taught at the lessons in geography at the no.1 school in Tbilisi-the best school ever. Without any public discussion  both areas in the mountains were stolen from the Kartveli nation by N.Khrushchev’s clique. Diplomats, historians, linguists in the Republic of Sakartvelo have never applied officially to the SNG group of the former USSR , to the OSCE, to the UN on this problem. At the SNG Commonwealth of Independent States session it is possible to discuss this acute problem and make appropriate decisions, leading to the proper activity, returning those two areas back to the Republic of Georgia//Sakartvelo. Territorial disputes among former republics of the USSR are more easily resolved if the injustice was done no later than the year 1954. This is the modern law of the SNG. What and where is the indigenous Kartvelian//Georgian( better to say, AiaKartIberian) territory? The best answer is found in Mose Janashvili’s( 1855-1934) book ‘Saqartvelos istoria uudzvelesi droitgan 985 tslamde’( History of Saqartvelo from remote days to the year 985), III edition, printed in Tbilisi in 1906 at ‘Shroma’ publishing house. He learned the cuneiform script and literature written in that script and translated Hamurabi’s law code, 20 texts of kings of Chaldea of IX-VI centuries BCE, investigated the Creta-Mikenean culture, the Faistos Disc inscription, translated Mittannian king Tushratta’s letters to the pharao dating XIV century BCE. M. Janashvili is buried at the pantheon on mount Mtatsminda in Tbilisi. Only most prominent Kartvels find eternal repose there. Materials printed in this book are an attempt to tell the public at large in simplified terms that Aia is  Chaldea,  is Qardu//Kardu//Karduniash of the cuneiform inscriptions and that the Kardu nation//Kartveli//Qartveli, consisting of Suanmargals( Suans and Megrels) in remote days created that kingdom and her civilization. Their modern representatives are ethnic Georgians//Kartvels//Aiakartiberians (Kartvelians) living in the Reoublic of Georgia//Karti//Aiakartiiberia. These include also an unknown amount of persons that live beyond the Republic of Sakartvelo//Georgia. I adhere to those persons that criticize publishers of a distorted antikartvelian compilation called ‘Tskhovreba kartvelta da mepeta matta”( Life//history of the Kartveli nation and her kings). The northern river mentioned there as ‘Mdinare Mtsirisa Khazaretisa’ //the River of the Lesser Khazaria is in fact Khupani//Hupani//Hypanis that is now called Dnepr//Dniepr+river Bug nearby. That area is to the west of the peninsula called Aia and/or Aiaia by the indigenous population formerly, but called Krim//Kirim by new arrivals. Those are indigenous Aiakartiberian areas. Texts and maps attest it. Data on king Nebroti//Nimrod are fictitious and distort the truth in ‘Tskhovreba kartvelta da mepeta matta’. The cuneiformists add trouble to the interpretation of ancient texts by inventing new geographical proper names like ‘the Fertile Crescent’(  coined by G. Breasted in 1956 and, to the misfortune of readers, widely used to this day). Samuel Kramer is very popular for publishing books for non-specialists concerning texts written in cuneiform script. He, like most other scientists, did not cling to the proper names, geographical names attested in the cuneiform script. He substituted, changed those names by other words that are not in the text. This makes the interpretation and understanding of the texts even more difficult to most readers. The geographical proper names testify the role of this or that nation that created them. Clinging to the original text while translating those materials, texts into modern languages is the best policy. 

                                                                                                                                                         Natela Popkhadze